Ajay Gautam Advocate: Lawyer / Author / Columnist in India

Ajay Gautam Advocate: Lawyer / Author / Columnist in India

Ajay Gautam Advocate is a distinguished lawyer, author, and columnist based in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. With over years of experience, he is widely recognized for his expertise in banking and finance law, especially handling complex cases under the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and SARFAESI Act. Beyond his courtroom success, Ajay Gautam has established himself as a prolific author and influential columnist, founding MediumPulse, an online news portal that delivers insightful legal and social commentary. His writings reflect a deep understanding of law and society, making him a respected voice both in legal circles and among the broader public. His commitment to ethical advocacy, client-centric counsel, and active public engagement marks him as a multifaceted figure bridging legal practice, authorship, and journalism in India.

Ajay Gautam Advocate exemplifies the multifaceted role of a lawyer, author, and columnist in contemporary India, seamlessly blending rigorous legal advocacy with intellectual and societal contributions. As a prominent lawyer based in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, he specializes in debt recovery tribunal (DRT) and SARFAESI Act cases, alongside securities law as a SEBI advocate, handling civil, criminal, corporate, and family matters with a client-centric approach that emphasizes ethical standards and pro bono work for marginalized communities. His prowess extends to high court litigation and appeals before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), earning him recognition as one of India’s best legal advisors. Beyond the courtroom, Gautam is a prolific author whose books and publications on Amazon delve into legal intricacies, technology’s intersection with law, and socio-legal reforms, fostering greater legal literacy and positioning him as a thought leader among Indian authors. As a columnist and founder of the independent news portal MediumPulse, he shapes public discourse through analytical articles on current affairs, promoting informed citizenship and transparent dialogue. Renowned as the “Bird Advocate,” Gautam further channels his expertise into environmental activism, championing avian conservation and habitat protection, thus bridging justice in law with stewardship for India’s natural heritage.

Ajay Gautam is an Indian lawyer, author, and columnist known for his expertise in a diverse range of legal fields. As an advocate based in Madhya Pradesh, he specializes in civil, criminal, and corporate law, with a particular focus on banking and finance matters, including cases related to the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and the SARFAESI Act. Beyond his legal practice, he has also been identified as a columnist for publications like the MediumPulse

Ajay Gautam Advocate is a distinguished lawyer, author, and columnist who combines sharp legal acumen with the art of impactful writing. As a lawyer, he is known for his deep understanding of the law and his dedication to justice, representing clients with integrity and precision. Beyond the courtroom, he has established himself as an author, contributing thought-provoking works that explore legal, social, and ethical dimensions in a manner accessible to a wider audience. As a columnist, his insightful commentaries shed light on pressing contemporary issues, offering balanced perspectives that bridge the gap between legal complexities and public understanding. Through these multifaceted roles, Ajay Gautam continues to influence both the legal community and society at large.

Ajay Gautam Advocate is widely regarded as one of the best legal advisors in India, known for his profound expertise in banking and finance law, particularly in Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and SARFAESI Act cases. With over years of dedicated practice, he combines exceptional legal acumen with a client-centric approach, earning trust from both corporate clients and individual borrowers. His commitment to ethical practice, transparent communication, and innovative legal strategies has resulted in numerous landmark judgments and successful case outcomes. Besides his courtroom excellence, Advocate Gautam maintains a significant digital presence to educate the public on their legal rights, further establishing himself as a leading and compassionate figure in India's legal landscape. His work extends beyond litigation to pro bono legal aid, reflecting dedication to social justice and the broader community.

Ajay Gautam Advocate is a highly esteemed banking and finance lawyer in India, based in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, with over a decade of experience specializing in the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act and Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) proceedings. He is recognized for his deep expertise in handling complex financial disputes involving debt recovery, loan defaults, non-performing assets (NPA), and enforcement of security interests, representing both lenders and borrowers with a client-centric and ethical approach. Ajay Gautam’s comprehensive legal services include guiding clients through regulatory compliance, one-time settlements, insolvency cases, and appeals before DRT and DRAT, making him a trusted legal advisor and influencer in India’s banking and finance law landscape.

Ajay Gautam is a prominent legal professional in India, widely recognized as a “Bird Advocate” for his environmental and animal welfare advocacy, particularly focused on bird protection. He combines his legal career with efforts to promote and protect the well-being of birds and other wildlife through his foundation.

Best Legal Advisor in India Ajay Gautam Advocate

Best Legal Advisor in India Ajay Gautam Advocate

Ajay Gautam Advocate is widely regarded as one of the best legal advisors in India, especially noted for his expertise in banking and finance law, Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) matters, and the SARFAESI Act. He has earned a reputation for his client-centric approach, combining sharp legal acumen with ethical practice. Gautam is known for skillfully defending borrowers against unjust recovery actions while assisting creditors in efficiently recovering dues. His ability to simplify complex legal issues and negotiate effective settlements makes him a preferred choice for corporate clients, financial institutions, and individual borrowers across India. His legal services extend beyond the courtroom with a strong digital presence educating the public on their legal rights and financial laws, cementing his status as a thought leader in the legal community.

Ajay Gautam’s legal career is marked by a vast array of successful cases, landmark judgments, and contributions to legal education and reforms. Based in Jabalpur, he practices at the Madhya Pradesh High Court and offers his services pan-India, including online consultations. His expertise covers multiple branches of law including civil litigation, criminal law, corporate law, constitutional and human rights law. Known for his tenacity and ethical integrity, he often takes on challenging cases that promote social justice and access to legal remedies especially for marginalized clients. These qualities, paired with his proven track record of success and transparency in client communication, have earned him immense respect from clients.

Beyond his legal practice, Ajay Gautam is a notable legal influencer and author, actively sharing insights and advocating for reforms in the Indian legal system. His contributions to legal scholarship and proactive involvement in advancing the profession highlight his commitment to excellence and justice. Ajay Gautam's stature as a top legal advisor is bolstered by his professionalism, extensive knowledge, client dedication, and ethical standards, making him a trusted ally for individuals and businesses navigating complex legal challenges in India.

Ajay Gautam Advocate’s blend of practical expertise, ethical commitment, and influential legal thought leadership positions him as a premier legal advisor in India. Ajay Gautam Advocate has earned a reputation across Jabalpur and much of Madhya Pradesh as one of the best legal advisors in India. With years of experience in diverse legal domains, he is known for his versatility and depth of knowledge. His primary areas of practice include banking and finance law, debt recovery matters, handling cases under the SARFAESI Act, and litigation before forums like the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), and the High Court.

What sets Advocate Gautam apart is his client-centred approach and dedication to ethical practice. He is appreciated for offering clear, pragmatic advice, maintaining consistent communication, and preparing each case meticulously. He handles both sides of financial disputes — representing banks or financial institutions as well as individual borrowers — which gives him a balanced understanding of the challenges on either side.

Beyond courtroom advocacy, Ajay Gautam is also accessible for consultation in civil, criminal, family, property, and other legal matters. His reputation as a “Best Legal Advisor in India” is strengthened by his wide expertise and the trust he has earned among clients who require counsel that is both competent and dependable.

Advocate Ajay Gautam is highly regarded in the Indian legal community, particularly noted for his expertise in complex Banking and Finance Law, especially matters pertaining to the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and the SARFAESI Act (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act). Based in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, he has established a reputation for offering strategic counsel to both borrowers facing unjust recovery actions and creditors seeking to secure their claims. His in-depth understanding of the nuances within India's financial and debt recovery legal framework makes him a sought-after advisor for clients navigating high-stakes financial litigation. His work in integrating pivotal rulings from the Supreme Court and High Courts into his case strategies is frequently cited as a key factor in achieving favorable outcomes for his clients.

Ajay Gautam's acclaim as one of India's best legal advisors stems not just from his specialized domain knowledge but also from his extensive experience across diverse legal areas. With a professional background spanning numerous years since his enrollment with the Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh in 2006, he has successfully handled cases in Civil Litigation (including property and contractual issues), Criminal Law, and Corporate Law (advising on mergers, acquisitions, and compliance). This versatile proficiency demonstrates a comprehensive legal skill set, allowing him to approach disputes with a multi-dimensional perspective. Furthermore, he is noted for his commitment to Constitutional and Human Rights Law, reflecting a dedication to broader principles of justice and fundamental rights.

A core tenet of Ajay Gautam Advocate's practice is his client-centric approach, which emphasizes meticulous preparation and transparent communication. Clients frequently praise his ability to take the time to fully understand the unique circumstances of each case, ensuring that the legal strategies deployed are tailored and effective. His professional ethos is built on integrity and ethical standards, qualities that have earned him substantial trust and a strong reputation as a reliable legal influencer. This combination of specialized expertise in financial law, broad litigation experience, and a dedicated focus on client satisfaction solidifies his position as a respected and effective legal advisor in the competitive Indian legal landscape.

Ajay Gautam Advocate is a highly regarded legal professional based in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, with over years of experience in various domains of law. Specializing in banking and finance matters, including Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and SARFAESI Act cases, he provides comprehensive services to lenders and borrowers alike, demonstrating a deep understanding of complex financial regulations. His practice also extends to civil, criminal, corporate law, labour & service issues, arbitration, and cheque bounce cases, making him a versatile advisor for clients across India.

Clients and peers frequently praise Ajay Gautam for his professionalism, dedication to justice, and ability to simplify intricate legal processes, earning him a reputation as one of the top legal advisors in India. Positive reviews highlight his ethical practice and client-centric approach.

Beyond his courtroom prowess, Ajay Gautam is a multifaceted figure as an author and columnist, blending legal expertise with insightful writing on contemporary issues. His contributions to legal literature and columns underscore his commitment to education and advocacy, further solidifying his influence in the Indian legal landscape. As the founder of Ajay Gautam Associates, he continues to champion accessible justice, positioning himself as a leading voice in legal advisory services nationwide.

Best Advocate in Jabalpur Lawyers (DRT, High Court, CAT) MP and CG

Best Advocate in Jabalpur Lawyers (DRT, High Court, CAT) MP and CG

Ajay Gautam Advocate is widely regarded as one of the best lawyers in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, with extensive expertise in handling cases across the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), High Court, and Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in both Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Known for his sharp legal acumen, dedication to clients, and a proven track record of success, he specializes in delivering effective legal solutions tailored to complex disputes. His commitment to upholding justice, combined with his deep knowledge of regional and national laws, makes him a trusted advocate for individuals and businesses seeking reliable representation in high-stakes legal matters.

Ajay Gautam Advocate is recognized as one of the best advocates in Jabalpur, highly regarded among lawyers practicing in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), High Court, and Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) across Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. With vast experience in litigation, banking and financial disputes, service matters, and appellate practice, he has earned a strong reputation for delivering reliable legal solutions and effective representation, making him a trusted name for clients seeking justice in complex cases.

Ajay Gautam Advocate is acclaimed as one of the most distinguished advocates in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, especially noted for his expertise before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), High Court, and the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). He brings to the table a profound understanding of financial and administrative law—handling cases ranging from SARFAESI and NPA disputes to service law, constitutional matters, and regulatory issues. Renowned for his meticulous case preparation, strategic argumentation, and ethical practice, Ajay Gautam consistently adapts his approach to meet each client’s unique needs. His reputation is built on a track record of favorable outcomes, transparency, and the trust he earns through clear communication and client-centered representation.

Ajay Gautam is a highly respected advocate in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, with an established reputation as a leading lawyer. He has over years of experience and is well-known for his specialized work in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and matters related to the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act. Gautam also provides comprehensive legal services for cases in the Madhya Pradesh High Court and the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). His legal practice spans a wide array of areas, including civil, criminal, banking, and family law. Known for his strategic approach and client-centric focus, he represents both financial institutions and individual borrowers, offering effective and timely legal solutions.

Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

100 Landmark Supreme Court Cases in India

1. Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950)

2. Shankari Prasad v. Union of India (1951)

3. State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951)

4. A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)

5. M. P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954)

6. K. M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1959)

7. Berubari Union & Exchange of Enclaves Case (1960)

8. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1965)

9. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)

10. Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

11. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)

12. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976)

13. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)

14. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980)

15. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980)

16. S. P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981)

17. R. D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979)

18. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

19. Shah Bano Case (Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum) (1985)

20. India v. Union Carbide / Bhopal Disaster suits

21. Ranjit D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra (1965)

22. Indian Young Lawyers Association (Sabarimala) case

23. Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997)

24. TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)

25. I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007)

26. Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2009)

27. Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011)

28. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008)

29. NALSA v. Union of India (2014)

30. K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017)

31. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India

32. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (EWS Reservation) (2022)

33. S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)

34. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu & Others (1992)

35. Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India (1992)

36. A. K. Roy v. Union of India (1982)

37. D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997)

38. Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996)

39. M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (series, e.g. Taj Trapezium case)

40. M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (Vehicular Pollution)

41. M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga Pollution)

42. Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986)

43. Sahara v. SEBI

44. S. R. Tendolkar v. Municipal Corporation (Right to Access to Information)

45. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997)

46. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. v. SBI

47. Sreevatsa v. Union of India

48. Ujjam Bai v. State of Madhya Pradesh

49. Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995)

50. P. Venkataramana v. Union of India

51. Pradeep Jain v. Union of India

52. Unni Krishnan, J. P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (Education as fundamental right)

53. T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (forest and environmental law)

54. Nandini Sundar & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh

55. Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Privacy) (2017)

56. Bijli v. State of Haryana

57. Project Seabird v. Union of India

58. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation

59. Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. (Right to Shelter)

60. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India

61. Abdul Kalam v. Union of India (President’s Power, Pardon)

62. R. v. State of Maharashtra

63. D. R. Kumari v. Manohar Lal Sharma

64. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India

65. Sabarimala Entry case

66. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India

67. PUCL v. Union of India (Hawala Case)

68. Center for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India

69. In re: Presidential Reference (Third Judges case)

70. Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India (Fourth Judges case)

71. Supreme Court Advocates on Record v. Union of India (Second Judges’ case)

72. In re: Special Reference 1 of 1998 (collegium reference)

73. M. P. L. Suresh v. State of Karnataka

74. Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi

75. Chandigarh Administration v. Jagjit Singh

76. K. Veeraswami v. Union of India (Judicial accountability)

77. Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of Gujarat (arrest guidelines)

78. Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala

79. In re: Kerala Education Bill

80. Praga Tools Corpn. v. C. I. T.

81. A. C. Jose v. S. B. Jose (marriage/maintenance)

82. Abdul Vs. State of J & K

83. UOI v. Harish Chandra Shukla

84. Hiralal v. State of Assam

85. State of U.P. v. Kaushal

86. Veeraswami v. Union of India

87. Relying on test of proportionality — e.g. cases interpreting Articles 14/19/21

88. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Umed Ram Sharma

89. Vikas Singh v. Union of India

90. Kesavananda Bharati (already included)

91. I. R. Coelho (already included)

92. Landmark labor law judgments (e.g. Olga Tellis, Unni Krishnan)

93. Social justice judgments (like EWS, reservations)

94. Gender / women’s rights judgments (Vishakha, Triple talaq)

95. LGBTQ+ rights (Navtej Singh Johar)

96. Environmental law (MC Mehta series)

97. Privacy and data protection jurisprudence

98. Electoral law and reforms (e.g. electoral bonds, EVM-VVPAT)

99. Remission / death sentence jurisprudence (e.g. Bachan Singh)

100. Suo motu / PIL / Public Interest Litigation jurisprudence

100 Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

100 Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

These cases span fundamental rights, constitutional law, criminal justice, environmental protection, and more, representing pivotal moments in Indian jurisprudence.

1-20: Fundamental Rights and Individual Liberties

#	Case Name	Year	Summary
1	Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras	1950	Struck down a ban on a journal under the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act as violative of freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).
2	A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras	1950	Upheld preventive detention laws but laid groundwork for expanding Article 21's scope to include due process.
3	State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan	1951	Invalidated caste-based reservations in education, leading to the First Amendment introducing Article 15(4).
4	Shankari Prasad v. Union of India	1951	Affirmed Parliament's power to amend Fundamental Rights under Article 368.
5	Berubari Union Case	1960	Clarified that cession of territory requires a constitutional amendment, not just parliamentary legislation.
6	Golaknath v. State of Punjab	1967	Held that Fundamental Rights are not amendable by Parliament, introducing the prospect of judicial supremacy.
7	R.C. Cooper v. Union of India (Bank Nationalization Case)	1970	Expanded Article 31 to include the right to property and struck down parts of the Banking Companies Act.
8	Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala	1973	Introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting Parliament's amending power to preserve the Constitution's core features.
9	Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain	1975	Invalidated the 39th Amendment and reinforced the Basic Structure Doctrine in electoral law.
10	ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (Habeas Corpus Case)	1976	Upheld suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency (later overruled).
11	Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India	1978	Expanded Article 21 to include due process, interlinking it with Articles 14 and 19 for personal liberty.
12	Minerva Mills v. Union of India	1980	Struck down parts of the 42nd Amendment, affirming judicial review as part of the Basic Structure.
13	Waman Rao v. Union of India	1981	Applied prospective overruling to Ninth Schedule laws post-Kesavananda.
14	Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum	1985	Upheld maintenance rights for divorced Muslim women under Section 125 CrPC, sparking UCC debate.
15	Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation	1985	Held that the right to livelihood is integral to the right to life under Article 21.
16	M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case)	1987	Introduced absolute liability for hazardous industries, evolving environmental jurisprudence.
17	Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (Mandal Commission Case)	1992	Upheld 27% OBC reservations but capped total at 50% and excluded creamy layer.
18	S.R. Bommai v. Union of India	1994	Made imposition of President's Rule under Article 356 subject to judicial review.
19	Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan	1997	Laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at workplaces, later codified in POSH Act.
20	TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka	2002	Defined the scope of state regulation over private educational institutions' autonomy.

21-40: Criminal Law and Justice

 

#	Case Name	Year	Summary
21	Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar	1962	Limited sedition law under Section 124A IPC to acts inciting violence, protecting critical speech.
22	State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh	1999	Mandated procedural safeguards for NDPS Act searches to prevent abuse.
23	D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal	1997	Issued guidelines to prevent custodial violence and torture, enhancing arrestee rights.
24	Selvi v. State of Karnataka	2010	Prohibited narco-analysis, polygraph, and brain mapping without consent as violative of Article 20(3).
25	Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar	2014	Directed that arrests in offenses punishable by <7 years be exceptions, curbing misuse.
26	Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India	2017	Issued guidelines for mercy petitions in death penalty cases, emphasizing commutation.
27	Common Cause v. Union of India (Passive Euthanasia)	2018	Legalized passive euthanasia and living wills for terminally ill patients.
28	Mukesh v. State (Nirbhaya Case)	2017	Upheld death penalty for gang rape, reinforcing fast-track justice for sexual offenses.
29	Joseph Shine v. Union of India	2018	Struck down Section 497 IPC (adultery) as unconstitutional, violating women's dignity.
30	Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India	2018	Decriminalized homosexuality by reading down Section 377 IPC.
31	Hadiya Case (Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M.)	2018	Affirmed adults' right to choose partners, striking down forced conversions.
32	P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement	2020	Clarified bail under Section 438 CrPC in economic offenses, prioritizing liberty.
33	Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI	2022	Issued comprehensive guidelines on bail vs. jail, criticizing undertrial detention.
34	Bilkis Bano v. Union of India	2024	Quashed premature release of 2002 Gujarat riot convicts, upholding victim justice.
35	Kaushal Kishor v. State of UP	2023	Expanded hate speech regulation under Article 19(2), beyond IPC provisions.
36	Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India	2020	Struck down indefinite internet shutdowns in J&K as violative of free speech.
37	Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali v. NIA	2019	Set stringent bail criteria in terror financing cases under UAPA.
38	K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (Privacy)	2017	Declared right to privacy a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19, and 21.
39	Lalita Kumari v. Govt of UP	2014	Mandated FIR registration for cognizable offenses, preventing police discretion.
40	DK Basu Guidelines (reaffirmed in Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh)	2021	Strengthened custodial death prevention protocols.

41-60: Constitutional and Administrative Law

 

#	Case Name	Year	Summary
41	Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan	1965	Upheld Parliament's amending power over Fundamental Rights (pre-Golaknath).
42	Three Judges Cases (S.P. Gupta, SCAORA, Special Reference)	1981-1998	Evolved the Collegium system for judicial appointments, ensuring judicial independence.
43	L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India	1997	Held tribunals subject to High Court/Supreme Court review under Articles 226/32.
44	IR Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu	2007	Allowed judicial review of Ninth Schedule laws if they violate Basic Structure.
45	NJAC Case (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. UOI)	2015	Struck down the 99th Amendment establishing National Judicial Appointments Commission.
46	Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India	2018	Affirmed Delhi CM's executive primacy over Lt. Governor in most matters.
47	Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (Defamation)	2016	Upheld criminal defamation under Sections 499/500 IPC as reasonable restriction.
48	Shayara Bano v. Union of India (Triple Talaq)	2017	Declared instant triple talaq unconstitutional, violating Article 14.
49	Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (EWS Reservation)	2022	Upheld 10% EWS quota under 103rd Amendment as not violating Basic Structure.
50	Supriyo v. Union of India (Same-Sex Marriage)	2023	Denied constitutional right to same-sex marriage, leaving it to legislation.
51	Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India	2024	Struck down Electoral Bonds scheme as opaque and violative of voters' right to information.
52	State of West Bengal v. Union of India	1963	Clarified federal structure, holding states as equal partners with Centre.
53	Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab	1955	Executive derives power from Constitution, not mere legislative sanction.
54	UCO Bank v. Their Workmen	1963	Defined "industry" broadly under Industrial Disputes Act for labor rights.
55	Excel Wear v. Union of India	1978	Laid principles for retrenchment compensation in industrial disputes.
56	Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India	1984	Expanded Article 21 to include bonded labor eradication and rehabilitation.
57	People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (Right to Food)	2001	Directed implementation of food security schemes under Article 21.
58	Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh	1993	Held education a fundamental right up to age 14 under Article 21.
59	Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka	1992	Declared capitation fees unconstitutional, affirming affordable education.
60	Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust v. Union of India	2014	Exempted minority institutions from RTE Act's 25% reservation quota.

61-80: Environmental and Public Interest Law

 

#	Case Name	Year	Summary
61	Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India	1996	Introduced precautionary and polluter pays principles in environmental law.
62	M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Taj Trapezium)	1996	Ordered pollution control measures to protect Taj Mahal using sustainable development.
63	Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (Bichhri Case)	1996	Applied polluter pays principle to remediate chemical industry pollution.
64	Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India	2000	Balanced development with rehabilitation rights under Article 21 for displaced persons.
65	T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India	1997	Expanded forest conservation to all non-recorded forest areas.
66	Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar	1991	Enforced right to pollution-free water as part of Article 21.
67	A.P. Pollution Control Board v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu	1999	Emphasized expert committees in environmental decision-making.
68	Hanuman Laxman Charati v. State of Maharashtra	2009	Upheld community rights over private property in eco-sensitive zones.
69	Techi Tagi Tara v. Rajendra Oinam	2016	Mandated cumulative impact assessments for mining in fragile ecosystems.
70	M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (CNG Vehicles)	2001	Directed switch to CNG for public transport to combat Delhi air pollution.
71	Research Foundation for Science v. Union of India (Shipbreaking)	2007	Regulated hazardous shipbreaking under Basel Convention principles.
72	Lafarge Umiam Mining Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India	2011	Allowed mining post-environmental clearance if public interest served.
73	Orissa Mining Corporation v. Ministry of Environment	2013	Quashed mining leases in violation of Forest Rights Act.
74	Common Cause v. Union of India (Ganga Pollution)	2017	Ordered cleanup of Ganga, holding states accountable under Article 21.
75	M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India (Girnar Sanctuary)	2014	Protected wildlife habitats from development without clearance.
76	Alembic Pharmaceuticals v. Rohit Prajapati	2020	Relaxed effluent standards enforcement during COVID but upheld monitoring.
77	Hanif Qureshi v. State of Bihar	1958	Upheld cow slaughter bans as reasonable under Article 19(1)(g).
78	Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of UP	1985	Closed mining operations in Dehradun valley for ecological restoration.
79	Kamal Nath v. Union of India	1998	Applied Public Trust Doctrine to protect natural resources from commercial exploitation.
80	Intellectuals Forum v. State of AP	2006	Mandated relocation of coastal structures with environmental compensation.

81-100: Economic, Electoral, and Miscellaneous Law

 

#	Case Name	Year	Summary
81	Keshav Mills v. CIT	1965	Defined judicial review scope in tax matters under Article 136.
82	Excel Wear v. Union of India	1979	Upheld closure rights of industries under labor laws.
83	Air India v. Nergesh Meerza	1981	Struck down discriminatory retirement age for air hostesses.
84	M.G. Abellha v. State of Kerala	1989	Affirmed right to health as part of Article 21 for medical negligence.
85	Consumer Unity & Trust Society v. State of Rajasthan	1991	Allowed private participation in telecom under licensing regime.
86	Delhi Science Forum v. Union of India	1996	Upheld TRAI's regulatory powers in telecom liberalization.
87	Association of Registration Plates v. Union of India	2005	Mandated high-security plates for vehicles under MV Act.
88	Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India (2G Spectrum)	2012	Cancelled 122 2G licenses for arbitrariness, ordering auctions.
89	Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary (Coal Scam)	2014	Declared coal block allocations illegal, mandating e-auctions.
90	Yashwant Sinha v. CBI (Rafale Deal)	2019	Dismissed PIL challenging Rafale purchase, affirming commercial confidentiality.
91	Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (Electoral Rolls)	2023	Transferred ECI appointment to a committee including CJI for neutrality.
92	K. Krishna Murthy v. Union of India	2020	Mandated state EC appointments by independent committees.
93	People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (VVPAT)	2013	Directed VVPAT implementation for verifiable voting.
94	Lily Thomas v. Union of India	2013	Disqualified convicted legislators immediately upon conviction.
95	Public Interest Foundation v. Union of India	2018	Capped political party office terms and mandated inner-party democracy.
96	National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India	2014	Recognized transgender as third gender with equal rights.
97	Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (Aadhaar)	2018	Upheld Aadhaar's constitutionality with privacy safeguards.
98	Kaushambi Brickfield v. State of UP	2017	Protected child laborers' rights under Article 24 and 21.
99	Entertainment Network v. Super Cassette	2008	Balanced copyright and broadcasting rights under fair use.
100	Shreya Singhal v. Union of India	2015	Struck down Section 66A IT Act for chilling free speech online.

This list highlights cases that have profoundly influenced Indian law and society.